Discussion:
[Linux-ha-dev] New patch for resource-agents(nfsserver)
John Shi
2012-12-20 06:18:41 UTC
Permalink
Hi all,

Fix all cause an error to call rpc.statd, including:

Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd in meta_data.
Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd.
The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for rpc.statd

Best regards,
John
Dejan Muhamedagic
2012-12-24 09:57:26 UTC
Permalink
Hi John,
Post by John Shi
Hi all,
Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd in meta_data.
Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd.
The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for rpc.statd
Looks good to me.

Cheers,

Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
John Shi
2013-01-23 03:21:34 UTC
Permalink
Hi Dejan,
Is this patch OK ? I didn't see the pache going upstream yet.
Thanks!

Best regards,
John
Hi John,
Post by John Shi
Hi all,
Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd in meta_data.
Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd.
The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for rpc.statd
Looks good to me.

Cheers,

Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-***@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Dejan Muhamedagic
2013-01-23 07:32:56 UTC
Permalink
Hi John,
Post by John Shi
Hi Dejan,
Is this patch OK ? I didn't see the pache going upstream yet.
Thanks!
Oh, yes, I think so. Sorry, I missed it somehow. Will take care
of it today.

Cheers,

Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
Hi John,
Post by John Shi
Hi all,
Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd in meta_data.
Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd.
The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for rpc.statd
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Dejan Muhamedagic
2013-01-23 16:16:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Shi
Hi Dejan,
Is this patch OK ? I didn't see the pache going upstream yet.
Thanks!
Applied now. Can you please also test the attached patch. It is
fairly small and low impact, but still.

Cheers,

Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
Hi John,
Post by John Shi
Hi all,
Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd in meta_data.
Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd.
The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for rpc.statd
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
John Shi
2013-01-24 06:34:34 UTC
Permalink
Hi Dejan,

You take the action of checks on the place it should go, better!
Thanks in advance!

Best regards,
John
Post by John Shi
Hi Dejan,
Is this patch OK ? I didn't see the pache going upstream yet.
Thanks!
Applied now. Can you please also test the attached patch. It is
fairly small and low impact, but still.

Cheers,

Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
Hi John,
Post by John Shi
Hi all,
Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd in meta_data.
Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd.
The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for rpc.statd
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Dejan Muhamedagic
2013-01-28 11:43:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Shi
Hi Dejan,
You take the action of checks on the place it should go, better!
Thanks in advance!
Thanks for the review. Applied now.

Cheers,

Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
Post by John Shi
Hi Dejan,
Is this patch OK ? I didn't see the pache going upstream yet.
Thanks!
Applied now. Can you please also test the attached patch. It is
fairly small and low impact, but still.
Cheers,
Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
Hi John,
Post by John Shi
Hi all,
Specify the value of nfs_notify_cmd should be either sm-notify or rpc.statd in meta_data.
Rename the parameter nfs_notify_retry_time to nfs_smnotify_retry_time, bacase no retrytime option for rpc.statd.
The parameter nfs_notify_foreground can make the correct option for rpc.statd
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
Dejan
Post by John Shi
Best regards,
John
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
Loading...