[Linux-ha-dev] crmsh error : cib-bootstrap-options already exist

[Takatoshi MATSUO]

Hi Dejan

I caught this error with 1.2.6-rc1 when loading configuration file.
---
crm configure load update config.crm
ERROR: elements cib-bootstrap-options already exist
---

config.crm
---
property \
no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
stonith-enabled="false"

rsc_defaults \
resource-stickiness="INFINITY" \
migration-threshold="1"
---

I use
- RHEL6
- Pacemaker 83fc351 (latest)

Thanks,
Takatoshi MATSUO

[Dejan Muhamedagic]

Hi Takatoshi-san,

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Hi Dejan
I caught this error with 1.2.6-rc1 when loading configuration file.
---
crm configure load update config.crm
ERROR: elements cib-bootstrap-options already exist
---
config.crm
---
property \
no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
stonith-enabled="false"
rsc_defaults \
resource-stickiness="INFINITY" \
migration-threshold="1"
---
I use
- RHEL6
- Pacemaker 83fc351 (latest)

Should be fixed now. Thanks for reporting.

Cheers,

Dejan

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Thanks,
Takatoshi MATSUO
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Takatoshi MATSUO]

Hi Dejan

Thank you. I confirmed it.
But I catch another error.
I can't use a file which includes comment(#) again.

config.crm
-----------------------------------
property \
no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
stonith-enabled="false"

# comment
rsc_defaults \
resource-stickiness="INFINITY" \
migration-threshold="1"
-----------------------------------

# crm configure load update config.crm > /dev/null
Call cib_apply_diff failed (-203): Update does not conform to the
configured schema
ERROR: could not patch cib (rc=203)
INFO: offending xml diff: <diff crm_feature_set="3.0.7">
(snip)

Regards,
Takatoshi MATSUO

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Takatoshi-san,

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Hi Dejan
I caught this error with 1.2.6-rc1 when loading configuration file.
---
crm configure load update config.crm
ERROR: elements cib-bootstrap-options already exist
---
config.crm
---
property \
no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
stonith-enabled="false"
rsc_defaults \
resource-stickiness="INFINITY" \
migration-threshold="1"
---
I use
- RHEL6
- Pacemaker 83fc351 (latest)

Should be fixed now. Thanks for reporting.
Cheers,
Dejan

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Thanks,
Takatoshi MATSUO
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

Hi Takatoshi-san,

Unfortunately, Dejan is on vacation and I am not yet very familiar with
the crmsh code base, but I will try to solve the problem you are
experiencing.

On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:42:36 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
# crm configure load update config.crm > /dev/null
Call cib_apply_diff failed (-203): Update does not conform to the
configured schema
ERROR: could not patch cib (rc=203)
INFO: offending xml diff: <diff crm_feature_set="3.0.7">

I have been unable to reproduce this error in my test cluster. Could
you provide the current cluster configuration, prior to applying the
configuration update?

Thank you,
Kristoffer Grönlund
***@suse.com

[Takatoshi MATSUO]

Hi Kristoffer

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Takatoshi-san,
Unfortunately, Dejan is on vacation and I am not yet very familiar with
the crmsh code base, but I will try to solve the problem you are
experiencing.

Sorry for my late reply.
I had been on vacation too.

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013 09:42:36 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
# crm configure load update config.crm > /dev/null
Call cib_apply_diff failed (-203): Update does not conform to the
configured schema
ERROR: could not patch cib (rc=203)
INFO: offending xml diff: <diff crm_feature_set="3.0.7">

I have been unable to reproduce this error in my test cluster. Could
you provide the current cluster configuration, prior to applying the
configuration update?

I'll take and provide it.
Could you wait till tomorrow?

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Thank you,
Kristoffer Grönlund

Thanks,
Takatoshi MATSUO

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

Hi Takatoshi-san,

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:18:49 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Hi Kristoffer

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
I have been unable to reproduce this error in my test cluster. Could
you provide the current cluster configuration, prior to applying the
configuration update?

I'll take and provide it.
Could you wait till tomorrow?

Yes, no problem! Thank you.

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
Thank you,
Kristoffer Grönlund

Thanks,
Takatoshi MATSUO
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Takatoshi MATSUO]

Hi Kristoffer

I reproduced the error with latest changest(b5ffd99e).

My config.crm file
-----------------------------------------
property \
no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
stonith-enabled="false"

# comment
rsc_defaults \
resource-stickiness="INFINITY" \
migration-threshold="1"
-----------------------------------------

# rpm -qa | grep pacemaker
pacemaker-cli-1.1.11-0.1.83fc351.git.el6.x86_64
pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.11-0.1.83fc351.git.el6.x86_64
pacemaker-libs-1.1.11-0.1.83fc351.git.el6.x86_64
pacemaker-1.1.11-0.1.83fc351.git.el6.x86_64

# python --version
Python 2.6.6

# crm --version
1.2.6-0.rc1.el6 (Build b5ffd99e8bce)

# crm configure load update config.crm
Call cib_apply_diff failed (-203): Update does not conform to the
configured schema
<cib epoch="5" num_updates="1" admin_epoch="0"
validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" crm_feature_set="3.0.7"
cib-last-written="Wed Aug 21 13:46:15 2013" update-origin="16-sl6"
update-client="cibadmin" have-quorum="0" dc-uuid="1084752244">
<configuration>
<crm_config>
<cluster_property_set id="cib-bootstrap-options">
<nvpair id="cib-bootstrap-options-dc-version"
name="dc-version" value="1.1.11-0.1.83fc351.git.el6-83fc351"/>
<nvpair id="cib-bootstrap-options-cluster-infrastructure"
name="cluster-infrastructure" value="corosync"/>
<nvpair name="no-quorum-policy" value="ignore"
id="cib-bootstrap-options-no-quorum-policy"/>
<nvpair name="stonith-enabled" value="false"
id="cib-bootstrap-options-stonith-enabled"/>
</cluster_property_set>
</crm_config>
<nodes>
<node id="1084752244" uname="16-sl6"/>
</nodes>
<resources/>
<constraints/>
<rsc_defaults>
<meta_attributes id="rsc-options">
<comment/>
<nvpair name="resource-stickiness" value="INFINITY"
id="rsc-options-resource-stickiness"/>
<nvpair name="migration-threshold" value="1"
id="rsc-options-migration-threshold"/>
</meta_attributes>
</rsc_defaults>
</configuration>
<status>
<node_state id="1084752244" uname="16-sl6" in_ccm="true"
crmd="online" crm-debug-origin="do_state_transition" join="member"
expected="member">
<lrm id="1084752244">
<lrm_resources/>
</lrm>
<transient_attributes id="1084752244">
<instance_attributes id="status-1084752244">
<nvpair id="status-1084752244-probe_complete"
name="probe_complete" value="true"/>
</instance_attributes>
</transient_attributes>
</node_state>
</status>
</cib>
ERROR: could not patch cib (rc=203)
INFO: offending xml diff: <diff crm_feature_set="3.0.7">
<diff-removed>
<cib epoch="3"/>
</diff-removed>
<diff-added>
<cib epoch="4" num_updates="4" admin_epoch="0"
validate-with="pacemaker-1.2" crm_feature_set="3.0.7"
cib-last-written="Wed Aug 21 13:22:06 2013" update-origin="16-sl6"
update-client="crmd" have-quorum="0" dc-uuid="1084752244">
<configuration>
<crm_config>
<cluster_property_set id="cib-bootstrap-options">
<nvpair name="no-quorum-policy" value="ignore"
id="cib-bootstrap-options-no-quorum-policy"
__crm_diff_marker__="added:top"/>
<nvpair name="stonith-enabled" value="false"
id="cib-bootstrap-options-stonith-enabled"
__crm_diff_marker__="added:top"/>
</cluster_property_set>
</crm_config>
<rsc_defaults __crm_diff_marker__="added:top">
<meta_attributes id="rsc-options">
<!--# comment-->
<nvpair name="resource-stickiness" value="INFINITY"
id="rsc-options-resource-stickiness"/>
<nvpair name="migration-threshold" value="1"
id="rsc-options-migration-threshold"/>
</meta_attributes>
</rsc_defaults>
</configuration>
</cib>
</diff-added>
</diff>


FYI, I have no error if I remove comment line.
-----------------------------------------
property \
no-quorum-policy="ignore" \
stonith-enabled="false"

rsc_defaults \
resource-stickiness="INFINITY" \
migration-threshold="1"
-----------------------------------------

Regards,
Takatoshi MATSUO

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Takatoshi-san,
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:18:49 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Hi Kristoffer

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
I have been unable to reproduce this error in my test cluster. Could
you provide the current cluster configuration, prior to applying the
configuration update?

I'll take and provide it.
Could you wait till tomorrow?

Yes, no problem! Thank you.

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
Thank you,
Kristoffer Grönlund

Thanks,
Takatoshi MATSUO
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

--
// Kristoffer Grönlund
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

Hi Takatoshi-san,

On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:56:34 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Hi Kristoffer
I reproduced the error with latest changest(b5ffd99e).

Thank you, with your description I was able to reproduce and create a
test case for the problem. I have pushed a workaround for the issue in
the crm shell which stops the crm shell from adding comments to the
CIB. (changeset e35236439b8e)

However, it may be that this is a problem that ought to be fixed in
Pacemaker, so I have not created a new release candidate containing the
workaround. I will try to investigate this possibility before doing so.

Thank you,

[Takatoshi MATSUO]

Hi Kristoffer

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Takatoshi-san,
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:56:34 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Hi Kristoffer
I reproduced the error with latest changest(b5ffd99e).

Thank you, with your description I was able to reproduce and create a
test case for the problem. I have pushed a workaround for the issue in
the crm shell which stops the crm shell from adding comments to the
CIB. (changeset e35236439b8e)

I confirmed that I can load configuration file using new changeset.

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
However, it may be that this is a problem that ought to be fixed in
Pacemaker, so I have not created a new release candidate containing the
workaround. I will try to investigate this possibility before doing so.

I see.
Thank you.

Takatoshi MATSUO

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Thank you,
--
// Kristoffer Grönlund
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Vladislav Bogdanov]

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Takatoshi-san,
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:56:34 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Hi Kristoffer
I reproduced the error with latest changest(b5ffd99e).

Thank you, with your description I was able to reproduce and create a
test case for the problem. I have pushed a workaround for the issue in
the crm shell which stops the crm shell from adding comments to the
CIB. (changeset e35236439b8e)

Kristoffer, Dejan, could you please also look why I loose the whole
rsc_defaults $id="rsc_options"
section when I do 'crm configure edit' and edit one of
property $id="cib-bootstrap-options"?

pacemaker is 1.1.10, crmsh is latest tip.

Relevant log lines from cib process are:
Aug 23 08:44:23 mgmt01 crm_verify[5891]: notice: crm_log_args: Invoked: crm_verify -V -p
Aug 23 08:44:24 mgmt01 cibadmin[5897]: notice: crm_log_args: Invoked: cibadmin -p -P
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 crmd[10180]: notice: do_state_transition: State transition S_IDLE -> S_POLICY_ENGINE [ input=I_PE_CALC cause=C_FSA_INTERNAL origin=abort_transition_graph ]
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: log_cib_diff: cib:diff: Local-only Change: 0.772.1
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: cib:diff: -- <nvpair value="100" id="cib-bootstrap-options-default-resource-stickiness"/>
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: cib:diff: -- <meta_attributes id="rsc_options">
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: cib:diff: -- <nvpair name="allow-migrate" value="false" id="rsc_options-allow-migrate"/>
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: cib:diff: -- <nvpair name="failure-timeout" value="10m" id="rsc_options-failure-timeout"/>
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: cib:diff: -- <nvpair name="migration-threshold" value="INFINITY" id="rsc_options-migration-threshold"/>
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: cib:diff: -- <nvpair name="multiple-active" value="stop_start" id="rsc_options-multiple-active"/>
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: cib:diff: -- <nvpair name="priority" value="0" id="rsc_options-priority"/>
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: cib:diff: -- </meta_attributes>
Aug 23 08:44:25 mgmt01 cib[10175]: notice: cib:diff: ++ <nvpair name="default-resource-stickiness" value="10" id="cib-bootstrap-options-default-resource-stickiness"/>
Aug 23 08:44:28 mgmt01 crmd[10180]: notice: run_graph: Transition 84 (Complete=3, Pending=0, Fired=0, Skipped=0, Incomplete=0, Source=/var/lib/pacemaker/pengine/pe-input-28.bz2): Complete
Aug 23 08:44:28 mgmt01 crmd[10180]: notice: do_state_transition: State transition S_TRANSITION_ENGINE -> S_IDLE [ input=I_TE_SUCCESS cause=C_FSA_INTERNAL origin=notify_crmd ]
Aug 23 08:44:28 mgmt01 pengine[10179]: notice: process_pe_message: Calculated Transition 84: /var/lib/pacemaker/pengine/pe-input-28.bz2

What I edited is default-resource-stickiness, but the whole <meta_attributes id="rsc_options">
gone too.

Vladislav

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

Hi Vladislav,

On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:50:54 +0300

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
Kristoffer, Dejan, could you please also look why I loose the whole
rsc_defaults $id="rsc_options"
section when I do 'crm configure edit' and edit one of
property $id="cib-bootstrap-options"?

Hm, that is not good. I suspect that this may be a regression that I
caused when creating the workaround for the previously reported error.
I have narrowed the fix to be more precise in the crmsh repository
(commit 8a539c209eb0), it would be great if you could try using that
version of crmsh instead and see if that solves your issue.

Thank you,

[Vladislav Bogdanov]

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
Hi Vladislav,
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:50:54 +0300

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
Kristoffer, Dejan, could you please also look why I loose the whole
rsc_defaults $id="rsc_options"
section when I do 'crm configure edit' and edit one of
property $id="cib-bootstrap-options"?

Hm, that is not good. I suspect that this may be a regression that I
caused when creating the workaround for the previously reported error.

No-no, it was before that fix too, at least with 19a3f1e5833c.
Should I still try?

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
I have narrowed the fix to be more precise in the crmsh repository
(commit 8a539c209eb0), it would be great if you could try using that
version of crmsh instead and see if that solves your issue.
Thank you,

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

Hi,

On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:33:28 +0300

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
No-no, it was before that fix too, at least with 19a3f1e5833c.
Should I still try?

Ah, in that case, it has not been fixed.

No need to try. I will investigate further.

[Vladislav Bogdanov]

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:33:28 +0300

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
No-no, it was before that fix too, at least with 19a3f1e5833c.
Should I still try?

Ah, in that case, it has not been fixed.
No need to try. I will investigate further.

I verified that crm_diff produces correct xml diff if I change just one
property, so problem should really be in crmsh.

[Dejan Muhamedagic]

Hi,

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:33:28 +0300

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
No-no, it was before that fix too, at least with 19a3f1e5833c.
Should I still try?

Ah, in that case, it has not been fixed.
No need to try. I will investigate further.

I verified that crm_diff produces correct xml diff if I change just one
property, so problem should really be in crmsh.

Yes, just found where it is. The fix will be pushed tomorrow.

Cheers,

Dejan

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Vladislav Bogdanov]

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi,

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:33:28 +0300

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
No-no, it was before that fix too, at least with 19a3f1e5833c.
Should I still try?

Ah, in that case, it has not been fixed.
No need to try. I will investigate further.

I verified that crm_diff produces correct xml diff if I change just one
property, so problem should really be in crmsh.

Yes, just found where it is. The fix will be pushed tomorrow.

Yeeesssss!!!!!
Thank you for info.

[Dejan Muhamedagic]

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi,

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:33:28 +0300

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
No-no, it was before that fix too, at least with 19a3f1e5833c.
Should I still try?

Ah, in that case, it has not been fixed.
No need to try. I will investigate further.

I verified that crm_diff produces correct xml diff if I change just one
property, so problem should really be in crmsh.

Yes, just found where it is. The fix will be pushed tomorrow.

Yeeesssss!!!!!
Thank you for info.

A new RC has been released today. It contains both fixes. It
doesn't do atomic updates anymore, because cibadmin or something
cannot stomach comments. The updates for several distributions
are, as usual, available here:

http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/ha-clustering:/Stable/

And many thanks for testing.

Cheers,

Dejan

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Takatoshi MATSUO]

Hi Dejan

Thank you for your updating.
It works well for me :)

BTW, why doesn't "crm site" support "up" command ?
Only "end" is official ?

----
# crm site
crm(live)site# up
ERROR: 1: syntax: up
----

It seems that other all commands support it.

----
crm(live)resource#
? exit migrate reprobe stop up
bye failcount move restart trace
utilization
cd help param secret unmanage
cleanup list promote show unmigrate
demote manage quit start unmove
end meta refresh status untrace
----
----
crm(live)node#
? clearstate fence online standby
utilization
attribute delete help quit status
bye end list ready status-attr
cd exit maintenance show up
----

Regards,
Takatoshi MATSUO

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi,

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov

Post by Kristoffer Grönlund
Hi,
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:33:28 +0300

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
No-no, it was before that fix too, at least with 19a3f1e5833c.
Should I still try?

Ah, in that case, it has not been fixed.
No need to try. I will investigate further.

I verified that crm_diff produces correct xml diff if I change just one
property, so problem should really be in crmsh.

Yes, just found where it is. The fix will be pushed tomorrow.

Yeeesssss!!!!!
Thank you for info.

A new RC has been released today. It contains both fixes. It
doesn't do atomic updates anymore, because cibadmin or something
cannot stomach comments. The updates for several distributions
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/ha-clustering:/Stable/
And many thanks for testing.
Cheers,
Dejan

Post by Vladislav Bogdanov
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Kristoffer Grönlund]

Hi Takatoshi-san,

On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:25:14 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
BTW, why doesn't "crm site" support "up" command ?
Only "end" is official ?

Thank you for noticing this problem, the code which sets up command
aliases like "up" was missing for the site command. This has been fixed
in changeset 8a4ecedda149.

Best regards,

// Kristoffer
// ***@suse.com

[Takatoshi MATSUO]

Hi Kristoffer

Thank you.
I confirmd it.

Regards,
Takatoshi MATSUO

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Takatoshi-san,
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:25:14 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
BTW, why doesn't "crm site" support "up" command ?
Only "end" is official ?

Thank you for noticing this problem, the code which sets up command
aliases like "up" was missing for the site command. This has been fixed
in changeset 8a4ecedda149.
Best regards,
// Kristoffer
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Lars Marowsky-Bree]

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
A new RC has been released today. It contains both fixes. It
doesn't do atomic updates anymore, because cibadmin or something
cannot stomach comments.

Couldn't find the upstream bug report :-( Can you give me the pacemaker
bugid, please? Thanks!


Regards,
Lars

[Dejan Muhamedagic]

Hi Lars,

Post by Lars Marowsky-Bree

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
A new RC has been released today. It contains both fixes. It
doesn't do atomic updates anymore, because cibadmin or something
cannot stomach comments.

Couldn't find the upstream bug report :-( Can you give me the pacemaker
bugid, please? Thanks!

The bug's been reported here:


https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836965

Thanks,

Dejan

Post by Lars Marowsky-Bree
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/

[Dejan Muhamedagic]

Hi all,

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Takatoshi-san,
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:56:34 +0900

Post by Takatoshi MATSUO
Hi Kristoffer
I reproduced the error with latest changest(b5ffd99e).

Thank you, with your description I was able to reproduce and create a
test case for the problem. I have pushed a workaround for the issue in
the crm shell which stops the crm shell from adding comments to the
CIB. (changeset e35236439b8e)
However, it may be that this is a problem that ought to be fixed in
Pacemaker, so I have not created a new release candidate containing the
workaround. I will try to investigate this possibility before doing so.

This is an issue with cibadmin. Before that gets fixed, we'll
have to disable the cibadmin -P commit method and keep the old
one. At least I don't see any other sensible alternative.

Cheers,

Dejan

Post by Dejan Muhamedagic
Thank you,
--
// Kristoffer Grönlund
_______________________________________________________
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/